Du bon usage de la nature: Pour une philosophie de lenvironnement (Champs Essais) (French Edition)

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Du bon usage de la nature: Pour une philosophie de lenvironnement (Champs Essais) (French Edition) file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Du bon usage de la nature: Pour une philosophie de lenvironnement (Champs Essais) (French Edition) book. Happy reading Du bon usage de la nature: Pour une philosophie de lenvironnement (Champs Essais) (French Edition) Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Du bon usage de la nature: Pour une philosophie de lenvironnement (Champs Essais) (French Edition) at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Du bon usage de la nature: Pour une philosophie de lenvironnement (Champs Essais) (French Edition) Pocket Guide.

It thus discourages thinking that if one person from a particular group has achieved success, then anybody from that group can. Still, some individual paths are particularly informative, exemplifying the life paths that explain the underrepresentation of members of their group, just as others are quite anomalous. Second, biologists know that selection pressures related to one trait can interact with those associated with another trait in surprising ways.

This insight neatly lines up with the concept of intersectionality and helps to keep one alive to the ways in which subpopulations within underrepresented groups may have much better or much worse outcomes than other members of the group. Consider the outcomes for women from wealthy backgrounds or Indigenous women and how they might differ from women in general. Third, selection is about the relationship of a group of individuals who share some trait to an environment; changing the environment can significantly change the outcomes for, and thus representation of, a group. So, this basically reframes our second question as what is it about professional philosophy that selects certain groups in, and other groups out of, our discipline and our community?

The final question is: Are these selection processes just? This question can be directed in various ways. Are the results of these selection pressures just? In other words, is the current underrepresentation of various groups itself an injustice? Is the selective environment as a whole just? Are specific selection pressures just?

When we find injustice it behooves us to figure out ways to ameliorate it. This is what the Good Equity Practices document seeks to do. Though it is far from comprehensive and will, presumably, need to evolve over time as our equity issues change, it seeks to identify places where members of underrepresented groups are selected out of philosophy as well as methods for creating an environment where they can flourish with the goal of keeping them in. The hope is that documents like these will become unnecessary but, until the demographics of professional philosophy begin to look significantly more like that of Canada at large, we have some serious work to do.

Greenwald, A. Saul, Jennifer. Schouten, Gina. Steele, Claude M. Spencer and Joshua Aronson. Et est-ce juste? Et la situation est-elle juste? Quand nous trouvons une injustice, il nous incombe de trouver des moyens de la corriger. Many university students have likewise been expelled, detained, or barred from travelling abroad; many Turkish students studying overseas have had their grants and travel permission revoked by their government. According to Scholars at Risk SAR , the global network that advocates for academic freedom and publicizes attacks on faculty, students, and administrative staff worldwide, Turkey is breaking new records when it comes to the harassment and persecution of academics.

While we in Canada fret and argue not unreasonably about the latest free speech controversy surrounding Jordan Peterson and his critics, it is worth bearing in mind the situation of Turkish academics. In alone, over higher education personnel in Turkey were fired and banned from public service or travelling abroad. More than of them were arrested, detained or named in warrants.

Many of those persecuted had signed public peace petition of January , condemning state violence against Kurdish youth activists and urging the government to begin peace talks with the Kurdish political movement KPP. Through its Academic Freedom Monitoring Project, SAR monitors and publicizes a terrifying number of killings, disappearances, and wrongful imprisonments of academics worldwide. It also keeps track of state-directed dismissals or firings, expulsions, and travel restrictions meant to silence scholars and students. SAR also identifies especially vulnerable academics, and connects them with prospective host universities in other countries.

Over scholars who are under threat are hosted each year this way. SAR identifies academics at risk through various means including individuals who contact the organization directly , and works with them to put together an information dossier for prospective university hosts without endangering them further. At the University of Guelph, where I teach, our SAR committee has worked over the past few years to build support and funding to host our first scholar at risk.

Working closely with the SAR program office, we invited a Turkish historian to come to Guelph for the year. Evren Altinkas, who has arrived safely in Guelph with his family, will resume his research, teach in his areas of speciality, and raise awareness about issues of academic freedom through public talks.

Dismissed from his university teaching position in Turkey, Dr. There are of course numerous possible objections to hosting a scholar at risk in this way. One concerns fairness: why single out academics when journalists, trade union activists, etc. Sometimes being chosen as a SAR scholar and being hosted by a foreign university suffices to protect an academic at risk upon their return home.

But if significant risks remain, SAR works to secure further opportunities for the scholar in the same country as the original hosting, or in a safe third countries. Hundreds of universities in over 40 countries are now institutional members of SAR. Is your university among them? Individuals can also become involved through the action campaigns that SAR has initiated, advocating on behalf of particular scholars and students who have been imprisoned or who face serious threats as a result of speaking out or because their research is deemed threatening by the government.

The network also coordinates working groups to enable collaborative research and advocacy on matters of urgent concern. In the past couple of years, controversies about campus speakers have become a staple of the news cycle. This, in turn, has gotten lots of people talking about campus free expression. Free expression champions often state that free expression is especially important on university campuses compared to other domains, but they tend to do so without argument.

In this, the final post in my CPA series on academic freedom, I want to make the case that if free expression is especially important on university campuses, it is so because of the academic mission of the university. Further, academic freedom is the freedom that is distinctive of universities, and free expression is part of that broader rubric. In Canada, freedom of expression is protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. All Canadians, irrespective of whether they work at universities, have freedom of expression. However, that constitutionally protected freedom of expression has limitations, including workplace limitations.

As I discussed in my last post , university members have a distinctive freedom over and above those freedoms protected by the Charter — academic freedom.

CPA-ACP | Blog de l'ACP | CPA Blog

So, university members have free expression and a whole lot more! Notice though, that the free expression that falls under academic freedom is a freedom afforded members of the university in their capacity as scholars who play a part in the academic mission of the university. So, not all campus speakers have the free expression that is a part of academic freedom.

Now, we want to be really careful about excluding too many people from this special academic free expression. After all, speakers can play a part in the academic mission in various ways. I might, for example, bring in a nurse to speak to one of my classes on a matter relating to applied ethics. By contrast, though, a social club as opposed to an academic body that brings in a speaker for an extracurricular event might be doing so for reasons other than the academic mission of the university.

If there is no conflict between this event and the academic mission of the university, then no problem. But if the non-scholarly event actually impedes the mission of the university, then the university is within its rights — arguably even duty-bound — to put a stop to it. Well, there is no simple answer to that, but one principle that is pretty fundamental here is collegiality — both the collegial, competitive appointment of well qualified scholars whom we trust to excellently advance the scholarly mission and the policies and practices determined by collegial governance, in such venues as department and Senate meetings.

It is part of academic freedom because we do better scholarship when we are not forced to suppress our sincere views as scholars. Now, this most centrally relates to views related to our scholarly expertise. However, it would be a bad idea to say that scholars only have academic free expression within their areas of expertise. Well, there are a bunch of reasons:. There is a further reason why university scholars should have free expression beyond their wheelhouse. One of the important roles that universities and university scholars provide to the broader society is intellectual leadership.

The public and the media look up to professors. Professors ought to be able to honestly express their views to the public on a wide range of matters without risking their jobs. Put simply: we want a world in which Einstein can speak to the public about world peace without penalty. When we allow the public conversation about campus free speech to treat the university just like any other domain, we miss out on the opportunity to vigourously defend academic freedom and the academic mission of the university. The argument from Charter freedoms may be a simpler one, but it does not do justice to the rich variety and important social purpose of academic freedom, nor to the crucial role of free expression that flows from both of these.

As I argued in my first post in this series, the threats to academic freedom are wider and more serious than those posed by reactions to controversial campus speakers. It is high time for philosophers — and scholars more broadly — to get the story right. She works on history of philosophy, philosophy of sex and gender, teaching and learning, and social philosophy. The French translation of this blog post has been done by Guillaume Beaulac, researcher in philosophy and in cognitive science, working in philosophy of cognitive science, on critical thinking and in epistemology especially social and applied.

However, I worried that debates about campus free expression were often misaligned with the principles of academic freedom. So, I set out to learn more and to share what I was learning. Academic freedom is defined in a range of international, national, provincial, and university-level statements. Each of them tells a slightly different story. Here are a few key texts:. Here is a handy overview of these documents. As well, most Canadian universities have their own statements on academic freedom — very often in faculty association collective agreements, but sometimes also at the level of university policy.

What emerges when you start to read these documents is that academic freedom is complex. In general, the fullest statements of academic freedom discuss the following elements:. As well, some statements of academic freedom include discussion of institutional autonomy — the right of universities to determine their academic mission through the process of collegial governance. In general, organizations like Universities Canada, which represent the university as employer, regard institutional autonomy as the institutional form of academic freedom.

By contrast, CAUT, which represents faculty members as employees, emphasizes the academic freedom of individual scholars and treats institutional autonomy as importantly distinct from academic freedom. It looks something like this:. Universities and university scholars play a special social role in the search for truth and the advancement of knowledge. In order to perform this role, they require academic freedom. Scholars must be free to decide on lines of inquiry; to choose research topics and methodologies; to create; to curate; to teach; to learn; to disseminate their scholarship and creations; to criticize the institution and to express their views extramurally.

Further, they must be free from institutional censorship, including censorship of library collections. Academic freedom carries with it duties and responsibilities. In particular, scholars have the duty to use their academic freedom in a manner consistent with the scholarly obligation to base research on an honest search for truth. Scholarship including teaching should be conducted in accordance with ethical and professional standards. Scholars must not misrepresent their expertise, nor claim to represent the university.

This composite image covers what most academic freedom statements say about the source of academic freedom, what the subsidiary freedoms are, and what the attendant responsibilities are. This is one of the contested questions in the domain. Everyone agrees that tenure-stream university professors have academic freedom, and most people agree that university librarians have academic freedom. The question is whether non-tenure-stream instructors, post-doctoral researchers, support staff, and students have academic freedom.

Key academic freedom statements make clear that all teachers and researchers, irrespective of appointment type, ought to have academic freedom. However, there are few de jure protections of the academic freedom of most non-tenure-stream scholars. Finally, there is considerable disagreement over whether students — especially grad students — have academic freedom, and if so what types and to what degree. In short, academic freedom is important and complicated.

The story gets even more complicated when we consider the interaction between academic freedom and constitutionally-protected freedom of expression, and try to prise apart academic freedom from campus free speech.


Une image composite. Voici un survol pratique de ces documents. In , it is more crucial than ever that academics understand and defend academic freedom, and philosophers in particular are well placed to do this work. Academic freedom is the foundation of the modern university.

Mediaeval universities were associated with particular religious orders, and with the doctrines of those orders. By the turn of the 19th century, however, universities in Belgium and Germany had begun to articulate and defend the freedom to teach and to learn. Thereafter, it adapted its principles several times, and ultimately adopted the Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure , which remains a founding statement of the principles of academic freedom. The Statement has been adopted by more than scholarly bodies. While it is therefore of not only historical but contemporary importance, it is just one approach to academic freedom.

What exactly academic freedom is remains contested. The various academic freedom statements that guide university policies and practices have lots of overlap with each other, but they also disagree on such questions as who has academic freedom, what responsibilities attach to academic freedom, and whether scholarly institutions have a form of academic freedom. At bottom, though, academic freedom is a distinctive class of freedoms possessed by scholarly personnel of certain types of educational and research institutions by virtue of the social role that they — both the personnel and the institutions — fulfill.

It is not a single freedom, but rather an umbrella term for a number of freedoms, including the freedoms:. While freedom of expression is part of academic freedom, it is not the sum of academic freedom. I want to devote the remainder of this post to sketching why I think it is crucial that we understand and defend academic freedom, and by pointing readers to philosophers who are already doing work in this area. Defending academic freedom. Academic freedom exists so that scholars can take chances in their teaching and research — whether those chances amount to risky hypotheses, new methods, or politically controversial approaches.

However, since its origins, academic freedom has faced a number of threats.

These continue today, with some new ones added to the mix. Here is a quick inventory of just some of the challenges to academic freedom in Philosophers can help. The need to bolster academic freedom is urgent. Philosophers can help with this. However, there has been relatively little recent work on academic freedom by philosophers. Last but not least, I have since January been writing daily blog posts at my blog Daily Academic Freedom and tweeting about academic freedom using the hashtag dailyacademicfreedom.

I hope that other Canadian philosophers will join me in this work.

  • The Little Fluffs--Archetypes.
  • Dieu est-il écologiste ?.
  • Urbanisme en France — Wikipédia;

Les philosophes peuvent aider. Les philosophes peuvent aider en ce sens. Trudy Govier. Concern for the Truth. Impossible Judgments? Adam Morton. Species Identity. Peter Dietsch. Why central banks must change before the next crisis hits. Letitia Meynell. Who is where? And is it Just? References Greenwald, A.

Urbanisme en France

Monique Deveaux. Scholars at Risk: What it is, and why your university should join. Shannon Dea. What is academic freedom? A composite image. In general, the fullest statements of academic freedom discuss the following elements: the source or purpose of academic freedom; the various subsidiary freedoms that fall under academic freedom; the responsibilities associated with academic freedom ; who has academic freedom. It looks something like this: Universities and university scholars play a special social role in the search for truth and the advancement of knowledge.

Defending academic freedom Academic freedom exists so that scholars can take chances in their teaching and research — whether those chances amount to risky hypotheses, new methods, or politically controversial approaches. Correspondingly, the line between college instructors who do not typically have academic freedom and university professors who have academic freedom is blurring. One Alberta philosopher employed at a polytechnic was recently terminated by employers who told him that he would be a better fit at an institution that values academic freedom. In some cases, such partnerships compromise the free inquiry of university scholars.

The Soviet Union strictly controlled research and researchers, and Margaret Thatcher scrapped tenure in the U. Today, over Turkish scholars face trial for their scholarly expression, and many are imprisoned.

Introduction : l’hypothèse méta-ontologique

But government threats to academic freedom are often subtle. In recent years, we have seen Canadian governments targeting particular types of research via federal and provincial funding agencies. When governments produce funding feasts for some disciplines and famines for others, scholars and universities are at less liberty to independently decide on which programs of scholarship to pursue.

While I think that the threats to academic freedom I listed above are more worrisome than current controversies over campus speakers, it is important to recognize that much of the public, and many in government are deeply worried about what they see as the chilling of freedom of expression on campus. No doubt, some recent attempts to shut down controversial campus speakers constitute academic freedom violations.

And some responses to so-called no-platforming themselves constitute academic freedom violations. Sometimes, these efforts go beyond attempts to get scholars sacked, and extend to threatening physical harm to them and their families. Meillassoux, Quentin. Quintilien, Trad. Jean Cousin. Saussure de , Ferdinand. Serres, Michel. Vitali-Rosati, Marcello. Qui sommes-nous? Sens Public - Revue Web. Texte en PDF Tweet.

Masquez la colonne info. Bibliographie Augustin. Austin, John, Langshow. How to Do Things With Words. Berkeley, George. Trois dialogues entre Hylas et Philonous. Mille Plateaux. De la grammatologie. Kant, Emmanuel. Critique de la raison pure. Sociologie et anthropologie. Nietzsche, Friedrich. Ainsi parlait Zarathoustra. Le Gai Savoir. Searle, John. Speech acts. La communication. La traduction.

La distribution. Le passage du Nord-Ouest. Le Parasite.