The State of Florida v. You: the Accuseds Guide to Defending a Florida DUI Charge

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online The State of Florida v. You: the Accuseds Guide to Defending a Florida DUI Charge file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with The State of Florida v. You: the Accuseds Guide to Defending a Florida DUI Charge book. Happy reading The State of Florida v. You: the Accuseds Guide to Defending a Florida DUI Charge Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF The State of Florida v. You: the Accuseds Guide to Defending a Florida DUI Charge at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF The State of Florida v. You: the Accuseds Guide to Defending a Florida DUI Charge Pocket Guide.

I was thankfully referred to him by a friend when I had a legal problem. There is no lawyer that can match his skills in the courtroom. I am forever indebted for the Justice that I received due to his great work. I ran into an incident when I was on felony probation in one county and i was charged with another felony in a different county. Ken was able to not only get me probation for the new charge, but also my old probation reinstated with a Withhold Adjudication on both charges. I hit the lottery hiring him so of course I would recommend him to anybody.

Padowitz is the best lawyer there is. He answers every phone call and email. Will give you all the information you need, and answer every question. He got me the best possible outcome for my case. I got two charges dismissed, and a non convection for the main charge. He really does fight for you,and want the best outcome for you. From the first moment I met him, I knew I wanted him as my lawyer. Hire him as your lawyer, you will not regret it.

T Greatest Of All Time. Kenneth Padowitz , a Fort Lauderdale Criminal Defense Attorney , is frequently called upon by the news media for opinions and discussion on various legal issues being debated in the country and our community. This is not to be confused with high profile murder cases or other serious crimes where the defendant may attempt to plead insanity or diminished mental capacity to avoid a longer or harsher sentence.

Grajek, a criminal defense attorney located in Lakeland, Fla. The rule of thumb for sentencing under federal court guidelines works as a points system: the higher point tally, the more rigorous the sentence. Just as there are harsher sentences, based on the points system, there is also leeway for shorter sentences, based on mitigating factors. If certain criteria are met under this old common law rule, then an accused may be found guilty but insane or not guilty by reason of insanity.

Sentencing is then either discretionary or mandatory depending on the state and the offense.

DUI Defense Strategies in Florida

The insanity plea is recognized in numerous countries worldwide, including Canada and most states in the U. Pleading diminished capacity can be similar to treading on thin ice, as mental and psychological issues are often difficult to prove with any degree of certitude. There are instances where a defendant may not have had a mental disorder prior to sentencing or cases where the accused did not display symptoms and no one realized there were mental issues. If a case makes it to court and the defendant does display troubling symptoms, sentencing is usually delayed until a mental assessment is carried out.

The results of such testing may end with the defendant being placed in a mental health facility. The sentencing process may then continue once the defendant recovers — if ever. Thomas C. View Larger Map. See other news sources publishing this article. Browse Categories Aviation Law. Arbitration and Mediation Law. Bankruptcy Law. Personal Bankruptcy Law. Commercial Bankruptcy Law. Business Law. Antitrust Law. Commercial Real Estate Law. Commercial Litigation Law. Contract Law. Copyright Law. Corporation Filings Law. Corporate Tax Law.

Government Contract Law. International Business Law.

Health Law Questions and Answers

Intellectual Property Law. Mergers and Acquisitions Law. Although you may have a very good, logical explanation, you should never communicate directly with an investigator in such a case. Your statement can and will be used against you and serve as proof of certain issues that might not be proved otherwise such as the fact that you saw a certain patient, that you prescribed a certain medication, that you did or did not do certain things, etc.

Additionally, you may have inadvertently violated a law or regulation that you did not even know existed such as advertising, billing or solicitation regulations. What may seem to you to be only a "minor" event may actually be viewed as much more serious by members of your professional board. We recommend that you not respond to the investigator but that you immediately hire an experienced health care attorney to advise you and respond on your behalf if called for. Don't wait. Answer Your medical practice should be organized as some business entity that limits your liability.

Both the professional association and the limited liability company limit the personal liability of owners. Most medical practices are organized and operate successfully as professional associations. However, if the practice owns significant assets in the form of real estate or other property, which is often the case with medical practices, we recommend the formation of a limited liability company for those assets. A limited liability company may provide tax advantages when assets such as real estate appreciate in value.

Question I have heard that there are new Medicare regulations which required physician groups that perform diagnostic testing, such as radiographic studies, to become licensed as Independent Diagnostic testing Facilities. Answer In , Medicare proposed requiring physician practices that perform diagnostic testing to comply with most of the enrollment requirements Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities are required to satisfy in order to bill for diagnostic tests provided to Medicare beneficiaries.

Medicare recently deferred the implementation of that requirement on physician practices so physician practices are not currently required to enroll in Medicare as IDTFs, as of December 10, Medicare is developing an accreditation process for physician practices that perform advanced diagnostic testing.

Physician practices performing advanced diagnostic procedures need to consult with their health law attorneys to ensure their practices remain complaint with the Medicare requirements. Mobile testing is another area that concerns Medicare. Physician practices should reexamine their lease agreements to ensure that they are not inadvertently contracting with a mobile testing facility. Answer This is a Federal Regulation which governs the amount that the Medicare Program will pay a health care provider as reimbursement for certain diagnostic tests which the provider purchases.

The new Federal Regulation goes in to effect on January 1, Physicians are permitted to bill Medicare for diagnostic tests performed by the physician, another physician in the ordering physician's office, or by personnel that are supervised by the ordering physician or another physician in the ordering physician's office. Medicare will pay up to the Medicare fee schedule amount for these diagnostic tests. Physicians are also permitted to bill Medicare for purchased diagnostic tests excluding clinical laboratory tests. However, the billing physician must bill Medicare the lower of the physician fee schedule, or the actual amount the billing physician paid for the purchased diagnostic test.

Over the last few years, Medicare has seen a significant increase in the number of arrangements whereby physicians were able to significantly expand their traditional practices to include diagnostic testing. Medicare has expressed its concerns that many of those arrangements result in overutilization and abuse of the Medicare trust fund so Medicare made significant changes to the Medicare anti-markup provisions found in the Federal Regulations that become effective on January 1, Under the new anti-markup provisions, physician groups may still bill Medicare for diagnostic test the physician group orders if the physician group performs those tests.

However, if any portion of the test is performed or supervised by a physician that does not "share a practice" with the ordering physician, then the test is a "purchased test" and the anti-markup provisions apply. A physician shares a practice with the billing physician, for the purposes of the anti-markup provisions, if the arrangement satisfies one of the following two 2 alternatives. Alternative one, the physician performing or supervising the diagnostic test shares a practice with the billing physician if the performing or supervising physician furnishes substantially all of his or her professional services through the billing physician's practice.

Alternative two, the physician performing or supervising the diagnostic test shares a practice with the billing physician if the technical component of the test is performed and supervised, or the professional component of the test is performed, in the office of the billing physician. The office of the billing physician is the office where the ordering physician provides substantially the full range of patient care services that the ordering physician generally provides.

Physician groups should have their arrangements for diagnostic testing reviewed for compliance with the anti-markup provisions of the Federal Regulations on Medicare before the January 1, , effective date. RAC's are often referred to as "headhunters" or "bounty hunters" because they are paid a percentage of what they recover for the government. RAC Audits are specialized Medicare audits that originally began as a demonstration or pilot program. The RAC Program was developed by Medicare to identify "improper" Medicare Payments not detected using previously existing error detection and prevention program efforts.

By , CMS plans to have four major RACs in place that are responsible for identifying overpayments and underpayments. The new RACs are:. It is reported that additional states will be added to each RAC region in RAC Contractors are paid on a contingency fee basis. RACs are financially motivated to go out and find errors. RACs are now permanent and will develop an automated, ongoing denial system. How do RACs operate? RAC's conduct audits by reviewing medical data and billing data.

They rely on "automatic" and computerized reviews as opposed to complex medical reviews and complex billing analysis. An "automatic review" is a computerized analysis of claims and coding practices utilizing existing databases. These reviews identify errors such as duplicates in billing and the inappropriate bundling or unbundling of claims. These reviews identify billing errors and also lead to denials in payment based upon assertions of "no medical necessity" and "incomplete documentation.

RACs determine whether documentation for medical services provided meet the Medicare Guidelines for payment and whether the services are medically necessary. How can you prepare for a RAC Audit? If you are notified of an audit, immediately contact experienced health care counsel to begin representing you. HHS says that it took this opportunity to update the Privacy and Security Rules as HHS "has accumulated a wealth of experience with these rules, both from public contact in various forums and through the process of enforcing the rules.

These comments are due to HHS by September 12, They could help shape the final Regulations issued by HHS. In the recent past, HHS has seriously considered such comments it received. Question I received a letter from a Florida Department of Health DOH medical quality assurance investigator advising me that she was investigating a patient complaint that had been filed against me.

Answer First, we strongly recommend that you retain the services of an experienced health attorney who handles Board of Medicine cases and Department of Health Complaints. You need legal representation in even the simplest cases. Second, we do not allow our clients to sign and submit such "Certificates of Completeness of Medical Records. These are worded in the form of an affidavit in which you swear that the copy of the record you provide was the complete record.

We have seen these used against physicians in cases in which a complete copy was not made or submitted, or in which additional documents from the medical record were later discovered or obtained from the hospital, diagnostic facility or consultant. Physicians often delegate copying of medical records to low-paid or untrained administrative staff. Often they do not copy the complete record. Although these forms sometimes refer to a Florida law that requires this, we could find no such law.

Our firm has an exacting policy regarding checking, page numbering, labeling and copying medical records we produce for a client, including ensuring copying of the backs of forms and reports, informal notes and "stick-ons," and the front and back covers of the medical record for paper medical records.

An investigation against a physician may result in charges related to improper record-keeping practices, missing medical records, or other charges, even if the original complaint is found to be without merit. Question What are the "federal health benefits programs" that are covered by the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the Stark Law? A Federal health care program is defined as any plan or program that provides health benefits, whether directly, through insurance, or otherwise, which is funded directly, in whole or in part, by the United States government or a state health care program with the exception of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program FEHBP section B f of the Act.

The most significant Federal health care programs are Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare and the Veterans programs. However, ones that are not specifically listed which probably meet the OIG's definition include, for example:. The Public Health Service PHS Military Hospitals and Health System although military personnel, dependents and retirees who receive their treatment in these facilities do not ordinarily pay anything, however there are sometimes billings to insurers as in the case of automobile accidents, accidents covered by homeowners insurance, care covered by health insurance plans or care necessary as a result of torts where there are pending civil actions or claims The Railroad Employees National Health and Welfare Plan RENHWP Postal employees are now under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program FEHBP.

Question What is a Civil Forfeiture of Property?


  • LEGAL NOTICE.
  • Product description.
  • Ring of Secrets (Culper Ring).
  • DUI Lawyer & Criminal Defense Attorney I Fort Pierce, Port St. Lucie.
  • Fort Lauderdale Criminal Defense Law Firm.

Answer The civil forfeiture of property has become a popular tool for state and federal agencies to fight alleged criminal activity. It is a civil proceeding that permits the government to seize personal property if it is believed that the property is "proceeds of criminal activity. There is a federal act that allows civil forfeitures and seizures. There is a similar Florida law which allows this. It is called the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act.

Both are somewhat similar. Typically, law enforcement authorities use this as a tool to shut down a business, operation or person they think is involved in criminal activity. Without any advance notice, and usually as part of a raid, or search and seizure or arrest, government agents will take everything that could help build a criminal prosecution, is evidence of a criminal act, or is used in furtherance of the alleged criminal act. This can include paper records, computer equipment, money, cell phones, automobiles and trucks, bank accounts, cash, and even houses or buildings.

The first notice you may have of this is when your bank advises you that a check on your account has bounced because of insufficient funds. If you check into this you may find it was because the bank account was seized. We are seeing more cases where both local and federal law enforcement authorities are using the civil forfeiture laws to seize property in cases where there are allegations of Medicare fraud, Medicaid fraud, "pill mill" operations, pharmacies filling an excess number of pain management prescriptions charged as "drug trafficking" by law enforcement , and physicians and clinics writing an excess number of pain management prescriptions also charged as "drug trafficking" by law enforcement.

If you are the subject of a seizure, always ask for an inventory of the items taken, obtain a receipt, and obtain the contact information of each agent or police official involved. Next, contact an attorney experienced in defending against such seizures right away. You have a number of rights and opportunities to get your property back. However, there is a very short time period to request a preliminary hearing on the matter. There may be many defenses that would allow you to get your property back. These include, for example, if you did not know the property was being used for criminal purposes or if you are innocent.

If there is an innocent co-owner of the property, such as a spouse, child or partner, that innocent co-owner has the right to get the property back. The important thing is to retain the services of an attorney experienced in these matters so that your attorney can obtain a hearing on this as soon as possible. However, there are defenses and often the government exceeds the bounds of propriety. The key to success in civil forfeiture actions is to immediately consult with an experienced attorney after the property has been seized. Your best defense is to act quickly.

Answer We are often asked the question"Should I voluntarily relinquish my license because I am being investigated? This often comes up in the context of a criminal investigation, a Department of Health investigation or a DEA investigation. I almost always counsel our clients to refrain from voluntarily relinquishing their professional licenses after any notice of a possible investigation being opened.

The reason I counsel this is because this treated the same as if the state licensing agency had revoked that license for cause. This applies even if the license is in another state, is inactive, or has expired, or if the health professional has a license in another state that he or she is using. When a health professional voluntarily relinquishes his or her professional license, the Office of the Inspector General OIG of the Department of Health and Human Services will take action to exclude that provider from the Medicare Program.

The health professional's exclusion from the Medicare Program to with also be provided to:. One should think thoroughly before voluntarily relinquishing a health professional license of any kind, once there is notice that an investigation has commenced or that a complaint has been received. Answer While individual states generally govern how long medical records are to be retained, the recent HITECH amendments to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIPAA rules require a Medicare Fee-For-Service provider to retain required documentation for six 6 years from the date of its creation or the date when it last was in effect, whichever is later.

Previously federal regulations required that medical records for Medicare and Medicaid providers and those contracting with Medicare and Medicaid providers only had to be retained for four 4 years. If you are a hospital or other health facility whose reimbursement is based on cost reporting, CMS now requires that providers submitting cost reports retain all patient records for at least five 5 years after the closure of the cost report. An administrative complaint or notice of intent is a serious matter.

Supreme Court of Virginia Opinions

Your facility could have its license suspended or revoked. You could incur large fines. If you are found to have committed the charges made in the complaint, you could lose Medicare or Medicaid provider status, forever. If you have a personal professional license or own other facilities that have licenses, you could lose these as well. The AHCA attorney is the prosecutor. The AHCA attorney is not there to help you or to give you legal advice. Remember that an administrative complaint proceeding against a license is a "quasi criminal" or "penal" proceeding under Florida law.

You should at least consult with a board certified health lawyer at the beginning of the case to find out the possible consequences. Answer Yes, you should. You may have already made a very bad mistake by requesting an informal hearing instead of a formal hearing. In an informal hearing, in effect you are pleading guilty; you are admitting everything alleged in the administrative complaint or notice of intent. The only thing to be determined is the discipline, fine or type of licensure action to be given.

You cannot dispute the facts and you cannot "prove" you or your facility did not commit the charges. An employee of AHCA will be appointed to be the "presiding officer" or "hearing officer. If you are not familiar with administrative proceedings or administrative hearings, you could commit serious errors that will harm your defense case and result in serious consequences.

An attorney may be able to have an informal hearing converted to a formal hearing where you can defend yourself and prove that you did not commit the charges filed against your facility. We recommend that in any case where you desire to show that the facts are different, that you or your facility did not commit the charges that are alleged, or that AHCA does not have sufficient evidence to show you committed the acts charged, always elect for a formal hearing and dispute the material facts.


  1. Simple Methods to Build Side Income for High School/College Students!.
  2. What is a DWI? Is it a crime in Florida? | Meldon Law.
  3. En brazos de su protector (Deseo) (Spanish Edition).
  4. Fort Lauderdale Criminal Defense Attorney | Federal - DUI |!
  5. How Do You Spell G-E-E-K??
  6. Question I have received an election of rights EOR form together with an administrative complaint or notice of intent. This can be a very serious matter with long-range consequences. Your EOR form must be completed fully and correctly and it must be received by the administrative agency, at the correct address, within the specified time. We usually send in the ones we submit by two different ways e. You can waive all of your rights if you do not do this correctly and timely.

    In many cases a petition for a formal hearing must also be filed meeting all of the technical requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act Chapter , Florida Statutes , and the Uniform Rules of Procedure, Chapter , Florida Administrative Code F. You should retain an attorney to assist you in order to do this correctly. If you desire to dispute the charges made against you, to show that you did not commit the conduct charged, or you simply want to require the agency to have to prove the case against you, then you should request a formal hearing , disputing the facts alleged against you, so that you have the right to do this.

    We recommend that you always consult with a board certified health lawyer or administrative lawyer at the beginning of the case to find out the possible consequences and to advise you. Question I am a licensed health professional with licensed in Florida and several other states. Answer No, if the state agency in Florida, the Department of Health , brings charges against your license, you may be able to successfully defend yourself. However, be aware that for professional licensure purposes, Florida treats a nolo contendere no contest plea the same as a guilty plea.

    It also treats a court disposition of "adjudication deferred" or "adjudication withheld" the same as a finding of guilty.

    If your attorney can show or argue remember, the State must prove the case against YOU; you do not have to prove anything or show that the offense is unrelated to the practice of your profession, the charge will have to be dismissed. The case of Ferris v. Turlington, So. We have been able to successfully keep discipline against health professionals' licenses from happening in several different cases. This is more important when you have licenses in several different states.

    If one state takes disciplinary action against you, then other states will, also. Question Is there a statute of limitations for administrative charges brought against my license as a healthcare professional? Answer In most states, there is no statute of limitations on administrative disciplinary charges brought against a licensed healthcare professional in a licensure matter. However, the equitable doctrine of laches or the constitutional doctrine of due process of law may apply in a similar fashion to bar old charges from being brought.

    In Florida, however, in , the Florida Legislature did pass a law that established for the first time a statute of limitations on administrative charges filed against a health professional licensed or regulated by the Florida Department of Health and its many professional boards. Now, the following statutes of limitations apply to administrative disciplinary proceedings brought against these licensed health professionals in Florida: 1 An administrative complaint against a licensee must be filed within six 6 years after the time of the incident or occurrence giving rise to the complaint against the licensee.

    These provisions can be found in Section In Florida and in those states in which there is no statute of limitations, the doctrine of laches or the legal concepts of a denial of due process of law may apply.

    In This Article

    If the licensee's defenses were harmed because the state waited so long to bring administrative charges, then these concepts come into play. If witnesses who could testify in favor of the licensee died, disappeared or became disabled during the delay, this might be a factor that causes these legal theories to come into platy. If documents needed by the defense were destroyed or are no longer available, this might be another such factor.

    These issues should be raised, briefed and argued, both in a motion to dismiss the complaint and at the hearing itself. A record should be made through affidavits, depositions, testimony of witnesses, or otherwise regarding these facts. Question I am a licensed health professional in the State of Florida. Answer The procedures to obtain a declaratory statement or "opinion" from any administrative agency for a matter that is under its authority in Florida are the same.

    They are set forth in Section What the employee of the Department of Health note: in Florida the professional boards are under the umbrella agency Department of Health and all staff employees are employees of the Department of Health advised you, was that you needed to file a petition for a declaratory statement, which is a procedure used to have the entire board or agency review your question and provide guidance to you on it. This would include: a person who is licensed by the board or agency involved;. Often the guidelines or professional opinions of professional associations are helpful to the agency considering the matter.

    Answer As a general rule, VA physicians and all other VA employees are immune from being sued for any negligence committed during the course and scope of their duties as a government employee. Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, individual has immunity from all civil liability. If you are incorrectly individually named as a defendant in a Federal tort claim or lawsuit based on a Federal tort claim, you should request that the VA counsel or assistant US Attorney defending the case have your name removed as a defendant. This is easily and routinely accomplished. Question What is a tort claim?

    Answer A claim filed for compensation alleging personal injury, property damage or death to a person caused by an alleged negligent or wrongful act or omission of a VA employee acting within the scope of their employment. Question What are the ways in which a tort claim can be paid or settled? NPDB reporting that is described in this pamphlet is limited to events related to paid tort claims and is not intended to cover NPDB reports for other adverse actions.

    Answer The payment or settlement of a tort claim by a VA Medical Center Director, Regional Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Assistant US Attorney, or damages awarded by a federal court judge trigger the paid tort claim review process which includes the panel review. Question Who are the panel members and how are they chosen?

    Answer The review panel consists of at least 3 members appointed by the Director, OMLA, who moderates and serves as advisor to the review panel. At least one panel member will be from the discipline e. Question Who decide which practitioners will be reviewed by the panel? Additional practitioners may be identified by VHA during the tort claim process. Question Am I or my malpractice insurer responsible for defending this claim? Answer No, tort claims are filed against the US government, not the individual practitioner involved in the episode of care under review.

    When indicated, a tort claim payment is made by the US government. Question What does the letter of notification mean to me? Will I be reported? This initial notification means that a practitioner was involved in the care of a patient for whom a malpractice claim has been initiated. Answer The review panel will consider the allegation, as given by the Regional Counsel, the medical record pertinent to the episode of care, practitioner statement, any report of an administrative investigation board appointed to investigate the care and the opinion of any consultant which the panel may request at its discretion.

    The review panel does not consider the SF, any documents generated primarily for consideration or litigation of the claim of malpractice e. Question Will the panelists know the rationale used to support the tort claim settlement or the amount of the tort claim settlement before they perform the review? Answer No, panel members are aware that the claim was paid but do not know the amount paid nor the reason the claim was settled. Question How long will the review process take? Practitioners have 60 days from receipt of this notification to review the medical record and submit a written statement for consideration by the review panel.

    Once a response is provided, or 60 days after receipt with no response has passed, the file is forwarded to OMLA. As this review process may take several months, a provider may periodically contact the Risk Manager for a status update if it is not being routinely provided. Question How will I be notified of the result of the review? It is the responsibility of the Medical Center Director to notify the involved practitioners of the panel's determination.

    Question Will my interests by represented by a VA attorney? Answer A practitioner may consult a private attorney at their own expense. Answer You should utilize the opportunity afforded you to provide a detailed written explanation of your involvement in the case and any extenuating factors that the panel should be aware of prior to making their determination. Reconsideration may be warranted based on submission of substantive new information not previously available to the panel. Does the tort claim process apply to me? Answer As a VA practitioner, a licensed trainee may find themselves involved in an episode of care which led to a tort claim.

    The panel will consider the claim and determine if the actions of a licensed trainee constitute gross negligence or willful professional misconduct; if so, the VAMC is responsible for reporting the licensed trainee to the NPDB, and if applicable, the SLB. Question I was the attending physician in a case in which the alleged tort claim was due to the actions of licensed trainees, e. Answer The OMLA review panel may determine that an Attending physician is responsible, in a supervisory capacity, for the actions of a licensed trainee who rendered substandard care and make a NPDB reporting recommendation.

    Answer You should immediately contact an experienced health law attorney familiar with NPDB reporting requirements and medical negligence issues. Question How will an attorney help me in this situation? Answer An experienced attorney will hep you to correctly respond to the relevant issues. Often physicians and other health care professionals make the mistake of pairing and submitting their own response without having it reviewed by experienced counsel.

    Most cases, the professional will pay far too much and may actually provide information that supports the requirement to file an adverse report on the physician or professional. We often recommend that the physician not only obtain all medical records relating to the treatment of the patient who filed the tort claim, but also allow us to retain the services of an independent outside expert witness in the same field of medicine. The expert witness report of the outside expert retained by your attorney may convince the reviewing panel that an adverse report against you to the NPDB is not appropriate.

    Answer OIG agents must comply with constitutional rights during an interview. Agents will identify themselves, present their credentials, and state the nature and purpose of the interview before the interview begins. If applicable, the investigator will state before the interview the employee's rights in regard to, among other things, remaining silent and obtaining legal counsel or union representation.

    These statements are referred to as warnings. It is important to know and understand the two kinds of warnings that a federal employee will hear once sitting down with an OIG. These two warnings are known as a Garrity and Kalkine warning. Question What is a "Garrity Warning? While no disciplinary action will be taken for remaining silent, an employee's silence may be considered in an administrative proceeding as evidence.

    A statement given to the OIG may be used as evidence in both a criminal or administrative proceeding. Never lie to any federal agent. It is a criminal offense to lie to a federal agent. Request to speak with an attorney. It is better to remain silent than to make a false statement. Question What is a "Kalkines Warning? A request given to a federal employee by a federal investigator to answer questions as part of an internal or administrative investigation. Disciplinary action, or dismissal, may be the result of a failure to answer questions completely and truthfully.

    A federal employee's answers to a question or any information derived from them may be used in an administrative proceeding. However, neither may be used against the employee in a criminal proceeding, unless he or she knowingly and willfully made false statements. Never made a false statement to a federal investigator. You may be prosecuted for doing so.

    Ask to consult with your attorney, if necessary, before you make any statement. Question Why are there so many other "Health Law Firms" or law firms with the "Health Law Firm" in them out there when I conduct a search for your law firm's name? It has been registered with the Florida Secretary of State's Office since It originally had its main office in Orlando, Florida, when it opened. Since then, it has opened offices in other locations, including one in Colorado, and has gained a national reputation.

    These per claim fines may be assessed by a civil monetary penalties action, brought administratively or civilly. The adjusted penalty amounts apply only to penalties assessed after August 1, , where the violations occurred after November 2, Whistle blowers and federal agencies which pursue violators always ask for the penalties in addition to any amounts actually paid by the government.

    Question What is the corporate practice of optometry and what does it prohibit? In the context of such laws, the term "non-physician" or "non-optometrist" almost always refers to one who is not licensed in the same state as the practice. Such prohibitions are entirely subject to each state's laws.

    Some states have statutes that prohibit the corporate practice of a profession.